Prompt's TechBlog
Ghost-bloggers II
27 March 2007No, don't go away, I'm not talking about Santo Politi again (or at least I wasn't, until I just mentioned him). And this will be the only mention of Dan Aykroyd, Slimer or Bill Murray you'll find (despite the lame pun used for today's title).
No, today's post is about ghost-written blogs. To be more specific, a service called Bring the Blog (yep, it is American). For $399 a year Bring the Blog will write a blog entry every business day for its clients. If that sounds like an awful lot of blog entries to produce, don't worry; their writers aren't in too much danger of developing RSI - the entries are industry-specific rather than tailored to individual clients.
Described as above, it probably sounds more like a glorified RSS news feed. And that might not be too far from the truth. Except that it's presented as a blog, and for a more personal touch clients can add their own blog posts.
Now, why, you might ask don't these clients just write all their own blog posts then? Well, according to Bring the Blog, it's because blogging can be time-consuming and "blogging software has become very technical" (as far as I've noticed, it's been getting ever more user-friendly).
This review of their services further suggests that many might also be put off by the "steep learning curve". I suppose that's not unreasonable - there are plenty of reasons why someone might not want to or might not feel able to write a blog. Equally, there's no reason why a company wouldn't want to enjoy the commercial advantages a good blog can bring, e.g. search engine visibility, interactivity, a reputation as a knowledgeable authority in the field, a more human, approachable face to the company. But to what extent can Bring the Blog provide these?
Despite the odd prominent spelling mistake (see the header), I'll take it on trust that they can provide quality blogposts that their clients' customers might want to read. And that having a blog will give their sites greater search engine visibility. And even that despite greater search engine visibility their customers aren't going to accidentally stumble upon identical content elsewhere whilst doing a little idle googling.
However, it's just not really blogging, is it?
It's not interacting with their customers (commenting isn't available just yet). It's not making the company more accessible and immediate. It's not humanising or personalising. It's not former Microsoft blogger Robert Scoble, for instance. That is, unless the clients are writing their own posts as well; perhaps using the Bring the Blog content as newsy, informative filler, or abandoning it altogether. Which leads us back to why the clients have outsourced their blogging in the first place: either they don't want to blog, or they don't feel able to. In which case, they're just not going to blog, are they?
Still, let's say they do try to write the odd post - maybe they're using Bring the Blog as a way to learn blogging - next to all those professional posts they've supposedly already written (it is ghost blogging - posts will be in the client's name), their real posts are going to have to be of a similarly professional standard not to stick out like a... well, like a badly written blog post, really.
All that said, though, perhaps there's the kernel of an idea here. Is the outsourcing of a company's blog not a viable option?
Well, the blogosphere has certain expectations - deception, for instance, is not taken to kindly; nor is thinly-veiled commercialism. People reading blogs like to know what they're getting - generally some kind of person-to-person interaction. Ghost-writing doesn't necessarily preclude this. Why shouldn't ghost-written blogs declare themselves as such?
Indeed, why shouldn't they be tailored to and reflective of the client? And even done with a bit of style. All that would be needed is some hint that someone relevant has been involved - Pink Floyd guitarist David Gilmour's blog might be a good example (clearly not written by him, but with his involvement). Even more than that, if a member of the company were prepared to respond to comments, I can't see why a meaningful dialogue with customers couldn't be established.
Doubtless some bloggers would still be sceptical, but perhaps there is room for a well thought out bespoke blogging service? Particularly in the consumer technology area, where engaging with customers is perhaps key to securing their loyalty. Well, I guess we'll just have to wait and see. I'm just not sure that it'll be Bring the Blog providing it. Certainly not yet.
Labels: corporate blogging, web 2.0
Comments:
Hi, Tim. Thanks for the review of Bring the Blog.
You touched on an issue that we debate a lot around here: just who *is* the typical Bring the Blog user?
We are finding that folks already on-board with blogging full-tilt have little need for us. They either (a) have the hang of blogging already, or (b) didn't see a return and are giving up the blogging adventure.
Bring the Blog has been best-received by folks that want to have an information source for their clients, but don't necessarily want to write it themselves.
(This time, I got the old "i before e" thing correct. Thanks for that spelling snafu alert!)
Bring the Blog is in its first iteration and we purposely designed the product to be limited-feature so we could see how our users are actually applying the product to their respective businesses. This is allowing us to grow the product to meet our users' needs. Adding "comments" is a major feature request and we are currently in development on that piece.
However, in true Bring the Blog fashion, each user will have the ability to turn commenting off. We are finding that some users just don't want the hassle of sorting through spam.
In the end, some folks want to create an educational environment, and other prefer the community aspect.
Thank you again for the coverage, and I wanted to return a favor to you. Last paragraph: it's "skeptical". ;-)
Hi Dan, I'm answering for Tim because he was only with us for a week gaining writing work experience (at which he did a fabulous job), but the topics that he covered are of great interest to several of us here at Prompt.
Thanks very much for dropping by and clarifying what Bring the Blog is about. I think that having frequently-updated, well written and relevant information is a must for any website that wants to attract and retain readers - and all credit to you for setting up a service that provides just that.
However, I think that customers who make use of your service should make it clear that the content has been sourced externally, rather than written in-house. The ethos behind blogging is one of transparency, honesty and openness, and to appear to pass off third-party content as your own work could lead to accusations of deception or to a perception of untrustworthiness.
As you know more than most people, corporate blogging is still in its infancy, and it will be interesting to see the formats, models and approaches that have the most success. We'll be watching Bring the Blog with interest, and I wish you luck with your endeavours!
PS We are British, so we spell 'sceptical' thus. (I so didn't want to say that, but couldn't help myself!)
Skeptical, sceptical... I didn't know that.
A lorry is a truck and Paul was the Walrus.
Thanks, Fiona, for following up!
<< Home

Posted by Tim Warren
